AIMPLB Criticizes JPC and Government Over Waqf Amendment Bill 2024: A Controversial Debate on Waqf Properties

Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

Concerns Over the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

Iliyas emphasized that the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 is designed to undermine Waqf properties systematically. He alleged that all 44 proposed amendments were drafted to alter the status of these properties, leading to potential misuse and destruction of their original purpose.

He remarked,
“The bill has been cleverly framed to usurp Waqf properties, violating the cultural and religious autonomy guaranteed under the Constitution.”

The AIMPLB has also voiced strong opposition to the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC), calling it a direct threat to religious freedom and cultural expression. Iliyas reiterated that Muslims would never compromise on Sharia law, labeling the UCC as a “well-thought-out conspiracy” by the ruling government.

Religious Places and the Places of Worship Act

Addressing the ongoing disputes surrounding religious sites, Iliyas cited the Places of Worship Act, asserting that the religious character of any place of worship should remain unchanged as of Independence Day.
However, he condemned recent incidents where false claims have been made against Islamic places of worship, including:

  • Gyanvapi Masjid (Varanasi)
  • Shahi Idgah (Mathura)
  • Bhojshala Kamal Maula Masjid (Madhya Pradesh)
  • Teliwali Masjid (Lucknow)
  • Jama Masjid (Sambhal, UP)

These disputes have led to tensions and violence, with Iliyas highlighting an incident in Sambhal where clashes during a mosque survey resulted in the deaths of three Muslim devotees. This violence also left 20 police personnel injured and prompted authorities to shut down schools and suspend internet services in the region.

The Road Ahead

The AIMPLB’s stand against the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 and its criticism of the JPC’s handling of issues underline a growing divide between the government and the Muslim community. The board has vowed to challenge these amendments, urging fair representation and protection of religious and cultural rights.

As the debate unfolds, it remains to be seen how the government addresses the concerns of stakeholders and navigates these sensitive issues. The AIMPLB’s resistance highlights the critical need for a balanced approach to safeguard both constitutional rights and societal harmony.

For the latest updates on this issue and other trending topics, stay tuned to Trending Global News!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version